Vol. 6 No. 01 (2022)
Original Article

Difference of The Knee Joint Response Force Between People with and without Intense Front/Anterior Cruciate Ligament Crack During Strolling

Shakil MIH
Orthopedic Consultant, Department of Orthopedics, Mymensingh Medical College & Hospital, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Islam N
Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Community Based Medical College & Hospital, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Published 15-08-2022

Keywords

  • Ligament,
  • Reaction,
  • Muscle,
  • Anterior Cruciate

How to Cite

1.
Difference of The Knee Joint Response Force Between People with and without Intense Front/Anterior Cruciate Ligament Crack During Strolling. Planet (Barisal) [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 3];6(01):174-87. Available from: https://bdjournals.org/index.php/planet/article/view/183

Abstract

Introduction: Front cruciate ligament is a harmful disease to every knee patient. Medical science calls it Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which assumes a critical part in knee joint security. It is asserted that the frequency of knee osteoarthritis expansions in people with front cruciate ligament (FCL) crack. The point of this study was to assess the knee joints' response force in ACL crack gathering contrasted with ordinary subjects. Methods: The study was directed in the Department of Orthopedic, Upazila Health
Complex (UHC) Sadar, Mymensingh. During the period between January 2018 and December 2021. A total of 48 patients with intense ACL crack and 15 sound subjects took part in this review. The ground response force (GRF) and kinematic information were gathered at a testing pace of 120 Hz during level-ground strolling. Spatiotemporal boundaries, joint points, muscle powers and minutes, and joint response force (JRF) of lower limit were examined by OpenSim programming. Result: The hip, knee, and lower leg joints response force at stacking reaction and push-off time frame position stage during strolling were fundamentally higher in people with ACL burst contrasted with solid controls (p esteem < 0.05). Strolling speed (p esteem < 0.001), knee (p esteem = 0.065), and lower leg (p esteem = 0.001) scope of movement in the sagittal plane were essentially lower in the patients with ACL break contrasted with solid subjects. The mean worth of vertical GRF in the mid-position, the pinnacle of the hip adduction second in stacking reaction and push-off stages, the hip abductor, knee flexor, and vastus intermedius, a piece of quadriceps muscle powers were fundamentally higher contrasted with sound subjects (p < 0.05) while vastus medialis and vastus lateralis created essentially lower force (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In light of the consequences of this review, lower appendage
JRF was higher in those with ACL burst contrasted with solid subjects might be expected to the compensatory systems utilized by this gathering of subjects. An expansion in knee JRF in patients with ACL breaks might be the justification for the high frequency of knee OA.