Vol. 4 No. 01 (2020)
Original Article

Impact of Breast Milk Gastric Lavage on Morbidity and Mortality in Preterm Neonates

Swapan Kumar Halder
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics, SBMC, Barishal
Gias Uddin Ahmed
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics, FMC, Faridpur
Dipanwita Popy
Lecturue, Community Medicine, SBMC, Barishal
Md. Mizanur Rahaman
Assistant Professor, Pediatrics, SBMC, Barishal
M A K Azad Chowdhury
Professor and Head, Neonatology, BICH, Dhaka

Published 20-09-2021

Keywords

  • Breast milk,
  • Gastric lavage,
  • Morbidity,
  • Mortality

How to Cite

1.
Impact of Breast Milk Gastric Lavage on Morbidity and Mortality in Preterm Neonates. Planet (Barisal) [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 20 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];4(01):11. Available from: https://bdjournals.org/index.php/planet/article/view/26

Abstract

The preterm baby has very limited stored energy and needs an adequate supply of nutrient in order to survive beyond a few days. Nutrients can be provided either parenterally or enterally. Hospitalized preterm newborns otherwise on exclusive parenteral fluids were evaluated to see the impact of gastric lavage with breast milk on morbidity and mortality. This was a hospital
based randomized controlled trial. In addition to parenteral fluids, sick preterm babies were assigned to receive either gastric lavage with mother’s milk within 12 hours of birth and subsequently every 4 hours till tolerance of nutritive enteral feeds (intervention or BML group, n = 40), or remain nil per orally till tolerance of nutritive enteral feeds (control or NPO group, n = 42). The main outcome was the mean number of days till successful tolerance of nutritive enteral feeds and mean number of days to achieve full enteral nutrition. They were also evaluated for mean duration of hospital stay, development of new complications, and mortality. Despite sicker babies in the BML group at baseline, the mean number of days till successful tolerance of nutritive enteral feeds was significantly less (P <.001) in BML (4.68±1.38 days) as compared to NPO group (6.36± 1.43 days). The mean number of days to achieve full enteral feed were also minimum in BML group (9.53±2.77 days) as compared to (13.22±3.11days) NPO group. In the NPO group 73.8% of the babies stayed longer than 2 weeks in hospital compared to only 27.5% in the BML group. The risk of development of new complication specially septicemia after randomization was also significantly less in BML group [RR 1.68 (95% CI 1.01 -2.85) (P=0.042)]. There was no difference in mortality between 2 groups. Early exposure to
even small amounts of breast milk in sick preterm neonates significantly reduced the days to tolerate enteral feeds, risk of sepsis and the duration of hospital stay.

References

  1. Kate F. transitional care and the convalescing NICU graduate, in Roberton’s Textbook of Neonatology. 4th ed. China: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 385.
  2. Ciaravino O, Vigliocco G, Gramajo JH, Sola A. Adolescence, not lack of prenatal care, impacts the incidence and outcome of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in a developing area. 2. Pediatric Research April 1997; 41 (4, part 2):3.
  3. Stoll BJ & Kliegman RM. Overview of mortality and morbidity in the fetus and the neonatal infant, in Nelson Rextbook of Pediatrecs, 18th ed. India: Elsevier; 2008.p. 671.
  4. UNICEF. The State of the World’s Children 2008. UNICEF, New York; December 2007. p118. 5. Mitra and Associates. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007 PRELIMINARY REPORT. MEASURE DHS, Macro International Inc. Calverton, Maryland, USA; December 2007.p. 25.
  5. Mostakim MA. Neonatal admission pattern and their mortality in a regional hospital in Bangladesh. ABSTRACT BOOK. 1st international Conference
  6. Bangladesh Neonatal Forum 2008, Dhaka.
  7. Slagle TA, Gross SJ. Effect of early lowvolume enteral substrate on subsequent feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. The Journal of Pediatrics 1988, 113 (3): p.526-31.
  8. Wharton BA, Bower BD. Immediate or later feeding for premature babies? A controlled trial. The Lancet 1965; 969-72.
  9. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, Gore SM. A randomized multicentre study of human kilk versus formula and later development in preterm infants. Arch
  10. Dis Child, Fetal and Neonatal Ed 1994; 70: 141-6.
  11. McGuire W, Anthony MY. Donor human milk versus formula for preventing necrotizing enter colitis in preterm infants: systemic review. Arch Dis Child, Fetal and Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F11-F14.
  12. Patel AB, Shaikh S. Efficacy of breast milk gastric lavage in preterm neonates. Indian Pediatr 2007 Mar; 44 (3): 199-203.
  13. Barua C, Alam B, Nath PK, Barua S, Biswas S, Chowdhury Z. Outcome of early breast milk gastric lavage in preterm neonates. ABSTRACT BOOK. 1st international Conference Bangladesh Neonatal Forum 2008, Dhaka.
  14. Rashid A, Ferdoush S, Chowdhury T, Rahaman F. Morbidity pattern and hospital outcome of neonates admitted in a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Child Health 2003;27(1):10.
  15. Islam MN, Khanom S, Kawsar CA. Maternal and socioeconomic risk factors associated with low birth weight. Bangladesh J of Child Health1995;19(4):112-116.
  16. Pietz J, Achanti B, Lilien L, Stepka EC, Mehta SK. Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a 20-year experience. Pediatrics 2007; 119:e164–e170.
  17. Groneck P, Speer CP. Inflammatory mediators and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995;73:F1–F3.
  18. Sullivan JL, Newton RB. Serum antioxidant activity in neonates. Arch Dis Child 1988;63:748–57.
  19. Mohandes AE, Picard MB, Simmens SJ, Keiser JF. Use of human milk in the intensive care nursery decreases the incidence of nosocomial sepsis. J Perintalol 1997; 17: 130-134.
  20. Goldman AS, Chheda S, Keeney SE, Schmalstieg F, Schandler RJ. Immunologic protection of the premature newborn by human milk. Semin Perinatol 1994; 18: 495-501.
  21. Meetze WH, Valentine C, McGuigan JE, Conlon M, Sacks N, Neu J. Gastrointestinal priming prior to full enteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1992;15(2):163-170.