Comparative Outcomes between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Nephron-Sparing Surgery – A Retrospective Analysis


PDF PDF

Keywords

Partial nephrectomy
Off-clamp technique
On-clamp technique
Nephron-sparing surgery
Warm ischemia
Estimated blood loss
Renal function preservation
eGFR decline
Positive surgical margin
Perioperative outcomes

How to Cite

1.
Comparative Outcomes between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Nephron-Sparing Surgery – A Retrospective Analysis. The Insight [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 17 [cited 2025 Oct. 27];8(02):333-4. Available from: https://bdjournals.org/insight/article/view/762

Abstract

Objective: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp techniques during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Methods & Materials: A retrospective study of 70 patients who underwent NSS for renal tumors between January 2020 and July 2025. Patients were divided into two groups: Off-Clamp NSS (Group A, n=34) and On-Clamp NSS (Group B, n=36). Data on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), complications, and renal functional outcomes (eGFR changes) were analyzed. Results: Group A showed significantly higher EBL (p=0.02) but better postoperative renal function preservation (mean eGFR drop: 5.6% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Group B had shorter operative times and less intraoperative bleeding. No significant difference was observed in complication rates or oncologic margin positivity. Conclusion: Off-clamp NSS offers superior renal functional preservation compared to on-clamp NSS at the expense of higher blood loss. Patient selection remains crucial, and off-clamp NSS may be particularly beneficial in younger patients with baseline impaired renal function.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The Insight