Vol. 7 No. 02 (2023)
Original Article

Comparative effect of Tactile Kinetic stimulation versus IntermittentKangaroo Mother Care on Length of Hospital Stay in Preterm Low BirthWeight Infants

Alam Iftekhar Belyat
Junior Consultant, Child Specialist, Atrai Upazila Health Complex, Naogaon, Bangladesh

Published 14-11-2024

Keywords

  • Preterm Infants,
  • Low Birth Weight,
  • Tactile Kinetic Stimulation,
  • Kangaroo Mother Care

How to Cite

1.
Comparative effect of Tactile Kinetic stimulation versus IntermittentKangaroo Mother Care on Length of Hospital Stay in Preterm Low BirthWeight Infants. Planet (Barisal) [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 14 [cited 2025 Mar. 16];7(02):85-9. Available from: https://bdjournals.org/index.php/planet/article/view/566

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm birth and low birth weight (LBW) contribute significantly to neonatal mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. Tactile Kinetic Stimulation (TKS) and Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) are non-pharmacological interventions with potential to improve neonatal outcomes, but comparative data on their effectiveness remain limited. Methods & Materials: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020, involving 73 neonates (gestational age 28–33 weeks; birth weight 1200–1800 g). Data on weight, length, heart rate, temperature, and time to achieve full feeding were collected. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v20.0, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Results: Both groups achieved comparable outcomes across all measured parameters. Time to achieve full feeding was similar (Group A: 5.63 ± 2.63 days; Group B: 5.50 ± 2.50 days; p=0.48). Weight and length increments over 21 days did not differ significantly (final weight: Group A: 2080.94 ± 152.87 g vs. Group B: 2038.57 ± 68.43 g; p=0.21; final length: both groups: 44.35 cm; p=0.42). Clinical stability parameters, including heart rate and temperature, were comparable across both groups. Length of hospital stay was similar (Group A: 32.34 ± 2.57 days; Group B: 31.68 ± 2.66 days; p=0.28). Conclusion: TKS and KMC are equally effective in improving neonatal outcomes among preterm LBW infants. Both interventions are feasible, cost-effective, and suitable for implementation in resource-constrained settings. Further studies are needed to explore their long-term impacts on development and health.